Probably one of the hardest questions to answer is if we did something correctly when researching. On the one hand, we have the WKC standards; on the other hand, we have client expectations.

We have all seen it happen. Audit rates something 5 stars, and then the client rates it a 1. Or, even worse, the client rates it 5 stars, and then the project fails the audit process. It can be really frustrating indeed.

So, how do successful analysts do it? How do they not only pass audits but make the client happy, too?

Audit

Did you know you can fail an audit just by simply ignoring formatting and other easy rules?

Our best analysts always pull up the audit rubric and check their work over. They make sure they have not forgotten any of the “little things” that we do when we write a research brief.

Logic

Then there are the “big things” like logic. If the logic is off, the whole research brief will be off as well. So, how do we make sure our logic is on point?

Many times, there is not a project type for your job. Then what do we do?